Skip to main content

Key Finding

Differences in U.S. and EU climate disclosure rules stem from distinct legal foundations—EU institutions have clear authority to mandate disclosures, while the SEC faces constitutional and administrative barriers

Abstract

In this article, we ask why mandatory disclosure of climate risk differs between the U.S. and the EU. We identify a fundamentally different legal basis for securities regulation on the two sides of the Atlantic. While the EU treaty provides EU institutions with legislative authority to introduce far-reaching climate disclosure obligations, the SEC faces significant hurdles to do so under U.S. administrative and constitutional law. We focus on the SEC because it has acted on climate. Congress could pass a comprehensive climate disclosure statute, but the subject is controversial in the United States, and so the legislature is unlikely to act. Moreover, we discuss pros and cons of climate disclosure from an economic perspective. Finally, we discuss the recent developments in climate disclosure regulation, both in the EU and in California, and their potential to set voluntary disclosure standards for companies not subject to these jurisdictions.

 


 

Related Working Papers

Scroll to Top