Carbon Offsets: Decarbonization or Transition-Washing?
Key Finding
After ESG downgrades, firms often substitute cheap carbon offsets for real decarbonization, using offsets strategically for transition-washing
Abstract
Using rich hand-collected data, we examine how firms use carbon offset credits issued by third-party developers to claim emission reductions. Guided by a conceptual framework, we show that following an exogenous ESG rating downgrade, firms facing greater internal abatement costs, including those with lower emissions, retire more carbon offsets rather than decarbonize in-house. Firms that lack climate-related governance mechanisms or face limited external scrutiny of climate claims strategically retire larger quantities of low-quality, inexpensive offsets. Our findings are consistent with offsets being used to outsource transition efforts as well as with the strategic use of offsets for “transition-washing” purposes.
Published in
© Sehoon Kim, Tao Li, Yanbin Wu, 2025
All rights reserved. Distributed for discussion purposes only; not to be reproduced without permission.
The views expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of ECGI or its members.
For copyright queries or takedown requests, contact wp@ecgi.org.