Beyond ESG: Executive Pay Metrics and Shareholder Support
Key Finding
Increase in ESG metrics has been accompanied by a higher propensity to use operating metrics
Abstract
We document that executive compensation contracts with ESG metrics are more likely to feature other financial and non-financial metrics and a higher proportion of equity-based compensation than contracts without ESG metrics. Companies introduce ESG metrics in areas where they have experienced good performance; however, these metrics have limited impact on actual executive payouts or the sensitivity of pay to market, earnings, and ESG performance. Similar to metrics linked to operating performance, ESG metrics are most prevalent in companies with recently appointed CEOs, new active blockholders, and those that have experienced dissent in say-on-pay votes. All metrics increase shareholders’ support in say-on-pay votes, reduce dissent on management proposals, and decrease the number of shareholder proposals, and ESG proposals in particular. Overall, the evidence suggests that ESG metrics, like all other metrics, aim to build shareholder consensus on executive compensation and corporate strategy.