Insurers' Carbon Underwriting Policies
Key Finding
We study the structure, implementation, and effects of carbon underwriting policies among the world's largest insurers
Abstract
We study the design, determinants, implementation, and real effects of carbon underwriting policies by large insurers. Adoption is more common among insurers from countries with stronger climate policies and less so among specialty and unlisted firms, with coal preceding oil and gas policies. Linking U.S. coal mines to insurers, we show that policy-adopting insurers reduce mine coverage, but implementation is incomplete and heterogeneous. Affected mines are likely to be abandoned and constrained, particularly when access to alternative insurance is limited. Our results are consistent with a simple insurance-supply model augmented with heterogeneous non-actuarial costs faced by insurers.
© Olimpia Carradori, Felix von Meyerinck, Zacharias Sautner, 2025
All rights reserved. Distributed for discussion purposes only; not to be reproduced without permission.
The views expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of ECGI or its members.
For copyright queries or takedown requests, contact wp@ecgi.org.