Skip to main content

Key Finding

Board pay is sensitive to oversight failures; but the effect depends on whether accountability is diffuse or concentrated

Abstract

We examine whether director compensation functions as an accountability mechanism following sustainability oversight failures. Using major EPA enforcement actions, we find that non-executive director pay declines significantly at violating firms, particularly when prior pay growth is higher. We argue that environmental incidents reframe board compensation as a potential governance liability, prompting restraint when scrutiny intensifies. This response propagates through board interlocks: firms connected through shared directors also reduce pay, with accompanying reductions in toxic emissions. Extending the analysis to other oversight failures, we show that compensation-based accountability depends on whether responsibility is diffuse, assignable, or perceived as external. 
 

Related Working Papers

Subscribe