Institutional Ownership Overstates Voting Power: The Allocation of Voting Authority
Key Finding
Institutional investors' reported ownership overstates realized voting power because adviser-client arrangements shape who votes
Abstract
Institutional ownership is commonly used to assess corporate governance influence, yet voting rights are often allocated through adviser-client relationships. We study how reported ownership translates into realized voting by reporting institutions and construct voting utilization, the fraction of reported ownership voted by the institution. Even among institutions that vote, the average institution votes 77 percent of its reported shares, and utilization varies substantially across institutions and firms. Advisers' stated allocation of voting authority strongly predicts which institutions vote. The largest institutional blockholders’ reported holdings overstate their realized voting control, implying that voting power is more diffuse than ownership suggests.
© Alon Brav, Tao Li, 2026
All rights reserved. Distributed for discussion purposes only; not to be reproduced without permission.
The views expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of ECGI or its members.
For copyright queries or takedown requests, contact wp@ecgi.org.