Beyond Bias: AI as a Proxy Advisor
Key Finding
AI may serve as a valuable benchmark or counterweight to traditional advisory firms.
Abstract
After documenting a trend towards increasingly subjective proxy advisor voting guidelines, we evaluate the use of artificial intelligence as an unbiased proxy advisor for shareholder proposals. Using ISS guidelines, our AI model produces voting recommendations that match ISS in 79% of proposals and better predicts shareholder support than ISS recommendations alone. Disagreements between AI and ISS are more likely when firms disclose hiring a third-party governance consultant, suggesting these consultants-often the proxy advisor itself-may influence recommendations. These findings offer insight into proxy advisor conflicts of interest and demonstrate AI's potential to improve transparency and objectivity in voting decisions.
© Choonsik Lee, Matthew E. Souther, 2026
All rights reserved. Distributed for discussion purposes only; not to be reproduced without permission.
The views expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of ECGI or its members.
For copyright queries or takedown requests, contact wp@ecgi.org.