The Pension System and the Rise of Shareholder Primacy

Award Winner: 
Winner of the 2013 Allen & Overy Law Prize (Best paper in the Law Working Paper series)

The Pension System and the Rise of Shareholder Primacy

Martin Gelter

Series number :

Serial Number: 
191/2012

Date posted :

June 01 2012

Last revised :

August 05 2012
SSRN Share

Keywords

  • defined benefit plans • 
  • defined contributions plans • 
  • Social Security • 
  • PAYGO • 
  • unions • 
  • human capital • 
  • firm-specific investment • 
  • Corporate governance • 
  • political economy • 
  • shareholder wealth maximization • 
  • Stakeholders • 
  • Corporate Social Responsibility

This article explores the influence of the pension system on corporate governance, which has so far received little attention in the corporate law literature. While the shareholder-centric view of corporate governance is strong today, this is a relatively recent development. “Managerial capitalism” began to give way to shareholder capitalism over the past three decades.

I argue that changes in the pension system, specifically the shift from defined-benefit plans to defined-contribution plans that began in the 1970s, have been a major force pushing the corporate governance system toward shareholder primacy. While in traditional pension plans, workers depended primarily on their employer’s ability to fund pensions, in today’s system retirement benefits strongly depend on capital markets. Shareholder wealth thus became more important for larger segments of society, and pro-shareholder policies became more important relative to pro-labor policies strengthening employees’ position vis-à-vis their employer. Consequently, shareholder primacy became the dominant factor in corporate governance debates. Managers today claim to focus on this objective and are less well positioned to take the interests of their firm’s employees or other groups into account. The political economy of corporate governance underwent a seismic shift. While it is not clear whether shareholders truly benefit from most reforms, these have been largely supported by the center-left given their apparent beneficial effects for shareholders and consequently the middle class. For the same reason, unions have been among the most eager proponents of shareholder activism.

View full abstract

Authors