A stylized fact that lurks in the background of the recent literature on common ownership is the parallel increase in the profitability of oligopolistic industries and common ownership. Some have argued that the growth in common ownership has caused the increase in oligopoly profits and have proposed a variety of policy responses.
This paper briefly reviews the available evidence and finds it unconvincing. It then provides an overview of the evidence that concentration and profitability have increased, considers alternative explanations, and suggests that the emergence of “superstar” firms -- and not the growth in common ownership – could be a fundamental driver of the parallel increase in concentration and profitability.
Using natural language processing, we identify and categorize the corporate goals in the shareholder letters of the 150 largest companies in the United...
A common argument against divestment is that it jettisons voting power and that it has a small effect on stock prices. We argue that divestment is a form of...
We contribute to the debate about the future of capital markets and corporate finance, which has ensued against the background of a significant boom in...