Skip to main content

Abstract

We investigate whether bank performance during the recent credit crisis is related to chief executive officer (CEO) incentives before the crisis. We find some evidence that banks with CEOs whose incentives were better aligned with the interests of shareholders performed worse and no evidence that they performed better. Banks with higher option compensation and a larger fraction of compensation in cash bonuses for their CEOs did not perform worse during the crisis. Bank CEOs did not reduce their holdings of shares in anticipation of the crisis or during the crisis. Consequently, they suffered extremely large wealth losses in the wake of the crisis.

 


 

Published in

Journal of Financial Economics
Ruediger Fahlenbrach, René Stulz
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages 11-26, January 2011

Related Working Papers

Subscribe