Enforcing Rules on Related Party Transactions in Italy: One Securities Regulator’s Challenge
Marcello Bianchi, Luca Enriques, Mateja Milič
While policymakers across the EU are considering how to implement the EU related party transactions (RPTs) regime contained in the Amended Shareholder Rights Directive, this paper analyses the Italian securities regulator’s experience in policing tunnelling after it introduced a new regulation on RPTs in 2010.
A number of high-profile corporate scandals and the inefficiency of the Italian framework in fighting dominant shareholders’ tendency to extract value to the detriment of minority shareholders prompted Italian policymakers to tackle RPTs by issuing a much more stringent set of rules than the previously existing one. Consob was entrusted with the task of both issuing the new rules and of enforcing them. Rising to the challenge, Consob designed a strict but flexible regulatory framework, based on mandatory transparency requirements and highly adaptable internal procedures. The key tool to prevent abusive RPTs was via an independent directors’ veto over material (large) RPTs.
This solution proved soon to be highly dependent on the regulator’s pro-active stance in enforcing the regime initiative.
In two case studies, the paper shows how, through timely actions and prompt use of formal and informal powers, the regulator was able to encourage companies to adopt better practices and improve RPT terms.
Yet, the story told in the paper has no happy ending: after a few years of zealous enforcement, Consob has become less aggressive in its fight against tunnelling. Based on the view that a widespread attitude of stigmatising tunneling has failed to materialize in Italy in the same period, the paper concludes that Consob’s retreat leaves room for more misbehaviour rather than signalling that aggressive enforcement of RPT rules on Consob’s part is no longer needed.
Authors



Related Working Papers
Emergency Measures for Equity Trading: The Case Against Short-Selling Bans and Stock Exchange Shutdowns
After the Covid-19 crisis struck, equity prices abruptly plunged across the world. The clear prospect of an almost unprecedented decrease in supply and...
Read moreA New EU Business Combination Form to Facilitate Cross-Border M&A: The Compulsory Share Exchange
Facilitating cross-border mergers and acquisitions has long been one of the objectives of European company law directives and regulations. This...
Read moreThe Case for an Unbiased Takeover Law (with an Application to the European Union)
Takeover regulation should neither hamper nor promote takeovers, but instead allow individual companies to decide the contestability of their...
Read moreCorporate groups with listed subsidiaries are common around the world, despite the risks they pose to minority shareholders. Shaping a firm as a web of...
Read moreRelated Codes
New Regulation on Banks' Organisation and Corporate Governance
Handbook on Corporate Governance Reports
Testo Unico sulle disponsizioni in materia di intermediazione
Report & Code of Conduct (The Preda Code)
Related Videos
Dr Tom Gosling interviews Prof. Luca Enriques, (University of Oxford &ECGI) about his paper, "Mandatory Corporate Climate Disclosures: Now, but How?
The first part of the online policy workshop on "Directors’ Duties and Sustainable Corporate Governance" took place on 11 November 2020. The report was presented by Luca Enriques (University of Oxford Faculty of Law) and Marco Becht (Solvay Brussels School for Economics and Management, Université Libre de Bruxelles).
Interview with Professor Luca Enriques, Allen & Overy Professor of Corporate Law, Faculty of Law, University of Oxford, ECGI Research Member, E
Watch the announcements of the 2017 Working Paper Prizes at the IMD, Switzerland.